<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Knowledge &#187; Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/tag/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk</link>
	<description>The ongoing collation of great articles &#38; online resources, from the people at Techdept.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Check. Check. Stop! Managing the Process Critically</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/research/check-check-stop-managing-the-process-critically/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/research/check-check-stop-managing-the-process-critically/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechDept</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/?p=1556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not long ago, a friend of mine turned me on to an interesting book entitled &#8216;The Checklist Manifesto&#8217; by Dr. Atul Gawande. Although Dr. Gawande hails from the medical field, I found his book interesting because he explores, in great detail, a topic that spans almost every aspect of our lives: how to get things done.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long ago, a friend of mine turned me on to an interesting book entitled &#8216;The Checklist Manifesto&#8217; by <span style="color: #000000;"><a href="http://gawande.com/about" target="_blank">Dr. Atul Gawande</a></span><a href="http://gawande.com/about" target="_blank">.</a></p>
<p>Although Dr. Gawande hails from the medical field, I found his book interesting because he explores, in great detail, a topic that spans almost every aspect of our lives: how to get things done.  But rather than focus exclusively on the medical profession, Gawande explores the tools that other professions use to manage complexity. He examines a wide range of specialties, including architects, pilots and chefs, to learn their technique.</p>
<p>What he finds is that, across the board, these industries rely heavily on checklists to succeed, even when the task at hand seems too complex for a simple recipe.  He examines how the checklist can be implemented in operating rooms to eliminate human errors, reduce infections and ultimately save lives.  But you don’t have to take my word for it. You can read <a href="http://www.gladwell.com/" target="_blank">Malcolm Gladwell</a>’s review of the book over at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Checklist-Manifesto-How-Things-Right/dp/0805091742/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1275518283&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank">Amazon.</a></p>
<p>One of Gawande’s most fascinating anecdotes is the visceral rejection of checklists by surgeons.   Over and over again, doctors reject the idea of a checklist because they feel it is beneath them.  After all, being a surgeon is something that requires years of educational study, research and intense on the job training.  We trust them to make life or death calls, to essentially improvise based on years of expertise.  Surely the idea that they would rely on a set of check boxes, to heal “by the book,” seems almost insulting.</p>
<p><a href="http://anidea.com/etc/check-check-stop-managing-the-process-critically/" target="_blank">Read more</a></p>
<p>By Garett for <a href="http://agencynet.com/#/anidea/" target="_blank">www.agencynet.com</a> June 3 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/research/check-check-stop-managing-the-process-critically/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gaming most popular internet activity for tweens</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/websites/gaming-most-popular-internet-activity-for-tweens/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/websites/gaming-most-popular-internet-activity-for-tweens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechDept</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/?p=1380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Children aged eight- to 14-years-old might be the most digitally aware generation yet, having never experienced life without mobiles, internet and computers, but 74% of children still opt for a modern version of old fashioned entertainment such as gaming. This is followed by 59% of children who most commonly use the web for homework. Although [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; width: 480px;">Children aged eight- to 14-years-old might be the most digitally aware generation yet, having never experienced life without mobiles, internet and computers, but 74% of children still opt for a modern version of old fashioned entertainment such as gaming.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; width: 480px;">This is followed by 59% of children who most commonly use the web for homework.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; width: 480px;">Although 95% of the 3,020 children surveyed said the internet was important to them, 30% said they would still prefer communicating with friends face to face while 15% would prefer texting and only 14% would rather chat online. Nearly 10% prefer communicating using their mobile phone.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; width: 480px;"><a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/DigitalPMBulletin/news/976825/Gaming-popular-internet-activity-tweens/?DCMP=EMC-Media-PM-Bulletin" target="_blank">Read more</a></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; width: 480px;">By Sara Kimberley, <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/" target="_blank">Brand Republic</a>, Jan 11 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/websites/gaming-most-popular-internet-activity-for-tweens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Marketing Asset Management Benchmark Report Released by Aberdeen Group</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/research/new-marketing-asset-management-benchmark-report-released-by-aberdeen-group/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/research/new-marketing-asset-management-benchmark-report-released-by-aberdeen-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechDept</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand asset management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/?p=1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aberdeen Group recently launched a new benchmark report titled “Marketing Asset Management: Managing Brand Compliance in Distributed Marketing Environments,” authored by Peter Ostrow, Research Director, Sales Effectiveness for Aberdeen Group. The report examined 136 organizations that have deployed marketing asset management (MAM) solutions and found that 100% of the top performing companies improved their return [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aberdeen Group recently launched a new benchmark report titled “Marketing Asset Management: Managing Brand Compliance in Distributed Marketing Environments,” authored by Peter Ostrow, Research Director, Sales Effectiveness for Aberdeen Group. The report examined 136 organizations that have deployed marketing asset management (MAM) solutions and found that 100% of the top performing companies improved their return on marketing investments, compared to 26% in other companies.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.widen.com/blog/widen-enterprises/0/0/new-marketing-asset-management-benchmark-report-released-by-aberdeen-group" target="_blank">Read More</a></p>
<p>By <a href="http://blog.widen.com/blog/marketing-20" target="_blank">Jake Athey</a>, April 7 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/research/new-marketing-asset-management-benchmark-report-released-by-aberdeen-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Co-Creation: Not Just Another Focus Group</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/research/co-creation-not-just-another-focus-group/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/research/co-creation-not-just-another-focus-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechDept</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/?p=1121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To launch Twist, a new men&#8217;s fragrance in its global Axe brand, Unilever turned to a preapproved crowd of eager young amateurs for help. In July 2008, Unilever executives convened 16 regular young men and women from around the world at a meeting in New York. Why? To tap them for ideas for a new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To launch Twist, a new men&#8217;s fragrance in its global Axe brand, Unilever turned to a preapproved crowd of eager young amateurs for help.</p>
<p>In July 2008, <a rel="topic" href="http://bx.businessweek.com/unilever/">Unilever</a> executives convened 16 regular young men and women from around the world at a meeting in New York. Why? To tap them for ideas for a new global fragrance for Axe, a brand of men&#8217;s body spray, antiperspirant, and shower gel. The company had previously experimented with consumer-driven product development for local launches, but never for one on such a large scale.</p>
<p>The young adults had been assembled by Face, a London-based firm that helps companies <a rel="topic" href="http://bx.businessweek.com/business-innovation/">innovate</a> through co-creation. Face runs two <a rel="topic" href="http://bx.businessweek.com/online-community-management/">online communities</a>: Headbox, for young adults, and Mindbubble, for women. Each group has about 7,000 members, all eager to opine on what brands should do next. For each commercial project, Face invites a small number of members to work as paid collaborators, with compensation levels depending on the project. It&#8217;s a new way to answer the question of how to harness an unwieldy crowd to a business&#8217; advantage.</p>
<p>Co-creation is more fluid than focus groups, says Face Chief Executive Andrew Needham, who helped to start the company in 2004. Presented with a brief, Needham&#8217;s participants are asked to develop an idea from scratch, while focus groups mainly offer feedback on ideas or prototypes that have already been prepared. &#8220;Often consumers take you to places that you would never thought of going to had you used more traditional research methods,&#8221; he says.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/mar2010/id20100319_283214.htm" target="_blank">Read more</a></p>
<p>By <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bios/Venessa_Wong.htm">Vanessa Wong</a>, April 1 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/research/co-creation-not-just-another-focus-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UserVoice: The easiest way to turn feedback into action</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/strategy/uservoice-the-easiest-way-to-turn-feedback-into-action/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/strategy/uservoice-the-easiest-way-to-turn-feedback-into-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechDept</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/?p=1125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listening to your customers just got a lot easier. Start a conversation. Take action. Build raving fans. 1. You ask a question. 2. Customers share their ideas and vote up the best ones. 3. Improve your product and customer loyalty. Visit site]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listening to your customers just got a lot easier. Start a conversation. Take action. Build raving fans.</p>
<p>1. You ask a question.<br />
2. Customers share their ideas and vote up the best ones.<br />
3. Improve your product and customer loyalty.</p>
<p><a href="https://uservoice.com/" target="_blank">Visit site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/strategy/uservoice-the-easiest-way-to-turn-feedback-into-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the secret to a successful website?</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/websites/what-is-the-secret-to-a-successful-website/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/websites/what-is-the-secret-to-a-successful-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechDept</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/?p=1127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s the million-dollar question: “What is the secret to a successful website?” I’m not foolish enough to suggest a single answer. But in more than a decade of working on client websites, I’ve noticed a recurring pattern: the sites that succeed are those that have a well-informed, passionate website owner at the helm. Read more By [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Here’s the million-dollar question: “What is the secret to a successful website?” I’m not foolish enough to suggest a single answer. But in more than a decade of working on client websites, I’ve noticed a recurring pattern: the sites that succeed are those that have a well-informed, passionate website owner at the helm.</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/5437-what-is-the-secret-to-a-successful-website">Read more</a></strong></p>
<p>By <a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/authors/paul-paul-boag">Paul Boag</a>, February 18 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/websites/what-is-the-secret-to-a-successful-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Most Expensive Domain Names</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/trends/10-most-expensive-domain-names/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/trends/10-most-expensive-domain-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechDept</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/?p=1072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s the most expensive domain name on the Internet? It&#8217;s not &#8216;Porn.com,&#8217; which comes in a close second, but &#8216;Fund.com,&#8217; at nearly $10 million. Using data from the Domain Name Journal, ABC News put together this list of top 10 most expensive URLs on the Web: 1. Fund.com, $9.99 million 2. Porn.com, $9.5 million 3. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the most expensive domain name on the Internet? It&#8217;s not  &#8216;Porn.com,&#8217; which comes in a close second, but &#8216;Fund.com,&#8217; at nearly $10  million. Using data from the Domain Name Journal, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/AheadoftheCurve/Story?id=7014819&amp;page=2" target="_blank">ABC  News</a> put together this list of top 10 most expensive URLs on the  Web:</p>
<p>1. Fund.com, $9.99 million<br />
2. Porn.com, $9.5  million<br />
3. Diamonds.com, $7.5 million<br />
4. Toys.com, $5.1 million<br />
5.  Vodka.com, $3 million<br />
6. CreditCards.com $2.75 million<br />
7.  Computers.com, $2.1 million<br />
8. Seniors.com, $1.8 million<br />
9.  DataRecovery.com, $1.66 million<br />
10. Cameras.com, $1.5 million</p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/AheadoftheCurve/Story?id=7014819&amp;page=2" target="_blank">Read more </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/trends/10-most-expensive-domain-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commando Usability Testing</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/trends/commando-usability-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/trends/commando-usability-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechDept</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/?p=1043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I aggregated all the most current resources I had found on lean usability testing into one post. As promised, this follow up post is about my personal experiences and lessons learned from doing Commando Usability Testing (CUT). I did CUT with around 30 different users in at least 5 different locations (all cafes): [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I aggregated all the most current resources I had found on  lean usability testing into <a href="http://www.astatespacetraveler.com/best-of-lean-usability-testing-practices-and-resources-2/">one  post</a>. As promised, this follow up post is about my personal  experiences and lessons learned from doing Commando Usability Testing  (CUT). I did CUT with around 30 different users in at least 5 different  locations (all cafes): 3 in Palo Alto last summer and fall, and 2 in NYC  this fall and winter.</p>
<h2>What is CUT?</h2>
<p>I had never heard it called this until <a href="http://glusman.blogspot.com/">Andre</a>’s <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/glusman/lean-usability">usability  presentation</a> last week. But what an awesome name <img src="http://www.astatespacetraveler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" /> . CUT is the most informal and low-cost  style of usability testing. Basically you go into the field (usually a  coffee shop) with your laptop and find random strangers to do user  testing/customer development on.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.astatespacetraveler.com/commando-usability-testing/ " target="_blank">Read more </a></p>
<p>By <a href="http://twitter.com/carterac" target="_blank">Carter</a>, Feb 22 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/trends/commando-usability-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digg: 5 Years in 5 Minutes</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/social-media/digg-5-years-in-5-minutes/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/social-media/digg-5-years-in-5-minutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechDept</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/?p=1005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great overview of the history / story of Digg (we really like the story of  how they picked the name)&#8230; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fkIjOP0aug]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great overview of the history / story of Digg (we really like the story of  how they picked the name)&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fkIjOP0aug" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fkIjOP0aug</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/social-media/digg-5-years-in-5-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>83% of Twitter accounts inactive in December 2009</title>
		<link>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/social-media/83-of-twitter-accounts-inactive-in-december-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/social-media/83-of-twitter-accounts-inactive-in-december-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TechDept</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/?p=999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although 75 million people had signed up for a Twitter account by the end of 2009, only 17 percent sent even a single Tweet in December ‘09, an all-time low for the micro-blogging service, research from RJMetrics has found. Overall, in the three years since it began, 40% of Twitter account holders have never sent one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although 75 million people had signed up for a Twitter account by the end of 2009, only 17 percent sent even a single Tweet in December ‘09, an all-time low for the micro-blogging service, research from RJMetrics has found.</p>
<p>Overall, in the three years since it began, 40% of Twitter account holders have never sent one Tweet and 80% have sent less than ten.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.furlongpr.com/83-of-twitter-accounts-inactive-in-december" target="_blank">Read more </a></p>
<p>By <a href="http://www.furlongpr.com/about" target="_blank">Furlong PR</a>, Jan 28th 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledge.techdept.co.uk/social-media/83-of-twitter-accounts-inactive-in-december-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
